Red Skies at Night

January 1, 2012

2011 in Reflection

Filed under: competitions, exhibits, inspiration, photography, photos, tools, workshops — Tags: , , — Eric Jeschke @ 4:53 pm

Chicken Little

Key: R20120101-155621-master

In years past I have taken occasion at the end of the year to look back on the year and reflect about what I’ve accomplished on my photographic journey and what goals I have set for the next year.  I am honestly not trying to toot my own horn here.  This is a journal, so it is mostly for me to look back and track my progress.  The thing I like about blogging is being able to read other’s journals and get ideas, be inspired, and take solace that others are struggling with their own creative goals, whatever they may be.

2011 was a good year, at least by most of my past measures of progress.  I entered several local contests and had pieces in all of the resulting shows.  I made a new folio (that is up to a higher standard of quality as far as the finishing), and learned some exciting new mounting techniques.  I didn’t make a book this year, but that was fine.  It was a conscious decision to skip doing so until I had a worthy project.  The making of a book just so I have “been there, done that” I have already done several times over now and is no longer interesting in its own right.  I attended a seminar by Dewitt Jones, and taught a mini-workshop on making folios.

But 2011 was also a year where the increasing feeling of “plateauing” weighed heavily upon me.  Near the middle of the year I was wrestling (mostly offline) with new ideas for getting out of my usual paths and forcing myself into some uncomfortable areas to help spark creativity.  The biggest issue here is trying to get myself out of being strictly a “found image” photographer.  To that I want to add a “create vision” photographer half; a kind of unrealized potential that I see.  To do this I wanted to force myself to create some photographs in a studio setting.  I didn’t want this to be an excuse to buy more gear, but sometimes just having a few new tools can let you experiment more easily with new ideas.  I purchased some inexpensive items to make a DIY mini-studio for shooting still life and macro subjects, bought a couple old manual focus portrait lenses and spent some days experimenting with these things.  I felt so far afield from my normal shooting habits that I made a new prefix for my image database keys: the “X” (for experimental) series–meaning I don’t even feel comfortable enough posting these images publicly that I felt the need to point out explicitly that they are experimental!

Looking forward to 2012, I plan to continue the these experiments and hopefully expand upon them.  I am interested in alternative printing techniques like cyanotypes made from digital negatives and might experiment with something like that a bit as well, if only just to get me out of my normal printing style.  Although I will still enter contests, I plan to put more emphasis on entering contests on the web, not just local ones. I’ll keep looking for reasonable opportunities to take workshops and seminars, but these are not a high priority, unless they look like they might directly assist with my goal of developing my other half (non-”found image” photography).  I continue to be intrigued by video and want to dabble in that a bit more.  There are likely to be more experiments like Menehune Weekend.

These are all lesser goals, however.  My absolute top goals for 2012 are:

  1. to organize my work into a much better online and offline presentation (separate from the blog),
  2. to reflect upon and prepare an artists statement that accurately reflects my work and style,
  3. to establish project-based photography as my main way of working.

I must really put some emphasis on these.  These are really critical to focus my work.  I feel more than ever that my own style becomes ever stronger, and usually it shows in whatever sorts of photographs I take.  I must figure out how to articulate that style and make that accessible to an audience, as well as organizing the work into coherent presentations.  Part of that will culminate in starting to put together solo shows of my work.  Looking at other bloggers I can often see their style coming through strongly, but there is no organization to the work.  It is just a loose collection of whatever they ran across in their day, or week.  This is also Eric, in 2011.  By the end of 2012 I would like to have some progress in organizing the photography so that it is not just a photostream, cool as those are.  This is a long row to hoe, and I expect to make only partial progress, but I am long past the time when I should have started that effort.  To finally tie in with today’s image: I have to stop running around like a chicken!

Lowest priority on the list: buy more gear.  My feeling is that my current kit is absolutely good enough for everything I am doing or want to do.  It is not constraining me in any way.  My gear is aging though.  I have a first-generation u4/3 mirrorless as my main camera.  Like all modern electronics its lifetime is measured in short years.  If the GH2 goes on a fire sale before the introduction of the GH3 I may buy one if I can find one at a good deal.  Or if the GH3 looks fantastic I may wait awhile until it drops in price and then buy one.  But I’ll happily keep chugging along with my GH1 and it’s “measly” 12 megapixel sensor until it gives out and/or I can pick up a new (old) replacement.

I am in need of a new tripod head, though, so I’ll probably be on the lookout for one sometime soon.  I’ll probably be fiddling with the lighting in my DIY studio so I may be making some lighting fixtures.  Also, soon I will have to make a decision about a new printer, because the old one will not last too much longer.  I will either succumb to the temptation to continue to “enjoy” the flexibility (and madness) of printing myself, or I will completely give up running my own printer and outsource all printing.  I am seriously considering the latter.

I could not finish this post without talking about music.  It is my second creative hobby, although it lags far behind photography in the amount of time that I give it.  In this area my goal is simply to play more and record more, and to try to expand my technique a bit beyond what I am doing now.  You will likely see the occasional post about music in 2012 as well.

Here’s hoping you reach your creative goals in 2012!

November 18, 2011

Portrait Primes for Micro 4/3rds

Filed under: lenses, products, small cameras, tools — Tags: , , — Eric Jeschke @ 11:04 pm
Portrait Primes

Key: R20111118-205322-levels

Left to Right:
40mm Konica Hexanon f1.8
45mm Pana Leica f2.8 Elmarit
50mm Konica Hexanon f1.4

Portrait Primes

Key: R20111118-210152-levels

Just look at the craftsmanship. Solidly-built. Real aperture ring. Distance scale. Hyperfocal marks. Heavy.

Portrait Primes

Key: R20111118-205502-levels

One of the interesting aspects of mirrorless cameras, due to their short flange back, is the ability (through the use of adapters) to mount almost any legacy 35mm glass on the camera. I had been intrigued by the idea of getting some legacy lenses, but I wasn’t really sure what I should get. My own legacy glass, from the old film days, was Pentax, and it is in none too good condition. In particular, it has a lot of fungus inside. I hadn’t used the film equipment in a long time and although I had stored it carefully with dessicant packets, I hadn’t stored it in a dehumidified room. I live in a rain forest, basically, so you can probably guess what happened. But, for a couple of years now I have been maintaining a proper dry room that is humidity and temperature controlled. It’s really done wonders for a lot of items, from slides and negatives, to guitars, to … breakfast cereal (nice having crunchy breakfast cereal in the morning!).

I digress. The relevant point (I think!) is that I finally felt that maybe if I bought some new (old) lenses that I might be able to take a little better care of them this time around. And for a long time I wondered what kind of lenses I should pick up, since almost anything can be mounted on u4/3 with the right adapter. In the last few months I began noticing images made with Konica Hexanon lenses on u4/3. I liked what I was seeing about the way these lenses rendered images on a micro four thirds body. I began to pay more and more attention to which lenses. Finally, as I recently reported here last week I parted with a little cash on EBay for a couple of used legacy prime lenses. As you are no doubt aware, these can be had for pennies on the dollar these days, here near the end of the mass transition to digital photography. And there is some very, very nice glass to be had to put on the front of your camera if you don’t mind turning a little wheel to focus instead of pushing a button. Me, I don’t mind turning a wheel now and then.

The lenses have arrived, but I am still waiting for the $20 adapter from Amazon. Can’t wait to give these bad boys a whirl. These are all moderate normals on 35mm, moderate telephoto (2X factor) on u4/3, so I now have a 40 (80mm) joining the current Pana Leica 45 (90mm) and rounding it out a 50 (100mm). I’m especially interested in comparing the 50 with the 45 for portraits.

These old manual focus primes scream quality in a way that the new plastic AF lenses do not. You can see that size-wise, they stack up quite well with the native u4/3 lens, although they are nowhere near as light. I do appreciate the plastic Pana lenses for their light weight, and to be fair, for their image quality (they are very nice after all), but there is something about an old MF lens, made of glass and metal, with an actual aperture ring, a smooth, damped focusing ring, and proper markings for distance, depth of field and hyperfocal length, that gives sheer pleasure in the tactile handling of the lens. Takes me back to those film days, it does.

Obviously, more to come when the adapter shows up.

September 5, 2011

Gear Talk 2011

Filed under: cameras, panasonic gh1, photography, process, products, small cameras, tools — Tags: — Eric Jeschke @ 5:44 pm

Micro 4/3rds Kit

Key: R20110905-165931

Pany 14mm f2.5 (28mm eqv), Pany GH1 w/20mm f1.7 (40mm eqv), Leica(Pany) 45 mm f2.8 macro Elmarit, Crumpler Quarfie.

…chickens sold separately.

Usually I’m not too keen on Gear Talk, although I’m certainly guilty of it from time to time. I’d prefer to talk about inspiration and the process and results of living a photographic life. And yet, gear is sometimes a part of that.

I thought I would make a post about what camera gear I am carrying and using these days, in as much for my own historical interest in the future as for my blog-reading friends out there in the here and now.

My camera of choice these days about 98% of the time is the Panasonic GH1. I find the 12 megapixel sensor is easily big enough for almost anything I want to print and I can print up to 20 inches (about 50.8 cm) a side no problem. The frames for these prints dwarf the expense of printing them, and I don’t have lots of room for these size prints in my home, so I don’t really feel the need for more megapixels. I do appreciate increases in sensor sensitivity and dynamic range, so that would be my main reason to upgrade to a newer u4/3 system from Panasonic or Olympus in the future. But for now I remain quite happy with the GH1.

I have a selection of u4/3 lenses to go with this system, but these days I am almost exclusively shooting with prime lenses. I carry 3 with me usually: the 14mm Pana f2.5, the 20mm Pana f1.7 and the 45mm Leica-branded f2.8 macro. The wonderful thing about u4/3 lenses is that I can carry all three of these lenses, with the GH1 and a spare battery and the whole kit is extremely small and light. On my last trip to NYC I bought a Crumpler bag at their store in Manhattan: the Quarfie. It’s a tad pricey, but I absolutely love this bag–it is the perfect size to carry the 3 primes plus camera and accessories unobtrusively. It drapes smoothly over the shoulder, sits comfortably just below the hip and I can wear it all day without hardly noticing that I have it on. It doesn’t even look like a camera bag, and that’s a big plus, but it does look good!

Of the three primes, the 20mm f1.7 (40mm equiv) is on the camera about 95% of the time. I just love this focal length. It is so versatile and I feel I can shoot just about anything with it. I have another case that holds just the camera with the 20mm attached which I sometimes carry if I want to go extra light. The 14 mm (28 equiv) gets thrown on from time to time for a wider view. I bought the 45 mm (90mm equiv) for portraits and macros, although I haven’t become too comfortable yet with this focal length. I want to use it more in the future and am slowing learning how it “sees”. I still use the 20mm for most candid portraits.

Crumpler Quarfie
Key: R20110905-161930-crop
Crumpler Quarfie
Key: R20110905-162327-crop

Shooting with primes has been a nice learning experience for me. I’ve been doing photography for nearly 30 years and in all that time I usually used zoom lenses. When I was using zooms I never thought about the focal length much, just zoomed to crop. Now I am acutely aware of how the focal length affects the view and I am able to previsualize the photograph in front of me much better. The fact that most of them are smaller and faster means that camera is more discrete and at the same time able to shoot in available light. I rarely feel at a disadvantage having the fixed focal length attached–quite the opposite, actually.

The other 2% of the time that I want to take a photograph I find that I didn’t bring my camera bag along. This is becoming rarer, because I enjoy the bag so much that I seldom leave the house without it, but when I do, and find myself wanting to take a photograph, I reach for my Nokia N8 camera phone. Its 28mm (equiv) f2.8 zeiss lens with a 12mp sensor takes a decent photograph when a bigger camera is not available, and I am often pleasantly surprised at the results. This camera phone was proof enough to me that the bottom segment of the digicam market is/will be rapidly eroded by the camera phone. I expect a rather huge collapse/consolidation of the pocket digicam market in the next few years.

April 5, 2011

Nokia N8 Camera Phone Mini-Review

Filed under: life, photography, photos, products, reviews, small cameras, tools, video — Tags: , , , — Eric Jeschke @ 10:56 pm

Hard Right

Hard Right
Key: R20110314-130746

I started to use camera phones when I first got my iphone 3G. This was something like 3 years ago now. However, even with that phone I felt like I had to “process” the pictures through some app to give it a toy camera feel, because the images just weren’t up to the quality I expected when using them “straight”. Time marches on, along with technology, and I have been shopping new phones for a few months now as the 3 year old phone begins to feel a bit sluggish and dated. Since I am a passionate photographer I thought that I’d look for a phone that had a good camera on it.  I saw that the Nokia N8 phone that was introduced late at the end of last year had a 12 megapixel camera with a 1/1.8″ sensor and a Carl Zeiss (28mm equiv) f2.8 lens. Small pixels, mind you, but that is a pretty decent sensor/lens combo even for a digicam these days. I saw a decent price for an unlocked one on Amazon and made an impulse purchase. I’ve been using it daily since January and thought it might be time for a small review here.

Olympus Pen EP-1 hooked up to a Nokia N8

Key: R20110226-111634

I have to say straight off that as a former/current iphone user, the Nokia Symbian user interface feels very dated and clunky, and occasionally borders on irritating. However, the hardware on this thing is first rate, and if you can come to grips with the interface it’s a pretty cool piece of kit.

  • First off, the camera: it’s really good for a phone cam. This is a better cam than most of the digicams I’ve ever owned. The lens is pretty fast (f2.8) for being so small, and it is sharp. Check out the foliage in the cow picture below. The photos show a typical amount of small sensor noise, but it is not bad at all. The camera has a real xenon flash, which comes in handy for indoor shooting in low light. AF is pretty quick, and there is a pretty decent default camera software app for changing settings. About the only real negative is that there is no manual exposure control of shutter speed (it is a constant aperture lens). Fortunately there is a straightforward exposure compensation control, which works fine. To top it off, it has a real dedicated button just for picture taking–no messing about poking at the screen!
  • Secondly, the video. This thing shoots HD 720P video, and it is very nice video. I’m not a huge video fanatic, but I take lots of short videos of my kids and such and it’s just a joy to whip this thing out and grab some decent high-def video from such a small device. Not only that, but there is a mini-HDMI port on one end of the camera that you can plug straight into a high def monitor or tv and watch your videos and photos on the big screen straight from the camera. Very slick.  My Flip Mino got retired the day I saw my first video from this thing.
  • The camera comes with 16GB of built in memory, but if that is not enough you can plug up to a 32GB mini-SD card into the side to expand it.  Speaking of ports, there is also a mini-USB port on the side.  I’ve successfully used this for downloading photos  from my cameras in the field (as shown below) and then uploading them to the internet through the 3G interface.  I’ve also plugged in a mouse, which works well.  I suppose you could use a keyboard, or many other USB type devices, including hard drives.
  • There is an upside to Symbian–battery life.  This phone only has a 600+ Mhz Arm processor, but Symbian is so efficient that the phone feels pretty snappy nonetheless, and I get several days (yes, days) of battery life out of it before I have to recharge.
  • The phone includes an FM radio receiver and transmitter. You can use the transmitter to play music stored on the phone or streaming internet stations on to a car radio or your living room receiver.  Very cool.  Of course there is also a built in gyroscope, touch gesture screen (gorilla glass!), compass, penta-band GSM transiever (it’s truly a world phone) with 3G.
  • Finally, as a phone, it is pretty good. Nokia has a long history with phones and generally knows how to do decent voice quality.  I find the call quality to be superior to my iphone 3G, although the speaker is a little more directional and needs a little practice to get it positioned on the ear properly. What is especially great though, is that Nokia doesn’t try to shut you out of VOIP, like most telecoms want to.  Instead, VOIP functions are deeply integrated with the regular calling software screens on the phone–you don’t have to run any special software program to make or receive VOIP calls.  This is key because most of the day I’m around a Wifi signal.  The VOIP calls are better than cell quality, do not use cell-plan minutes, and are easier on the battery.  I can remember when Apple wouldn’t even allow VOIP programs in their “app store” (small caps emphasis–sorry Apple, you really cannot make a trademark claim to that generic term).

Cow and Chickens in a Field of Green

Key: R20110320-160218

Ok, so enough gushing, onto the bad.  Apple has spoiled us for a good phone user interface.  Their hardware may not be the best, their walled garden just a little uncomfortable now and then, but at the end of the day it’s just pleasant to use an iphone.  And Android is on the other side pretty much closing the gap, or trying to.  Nokia’s Symbian feels like a snappy little OS, but the user interface, … sorry, very dated.  [Aside: And now their new president has thrown his lot in with Windows mobile, which has been trying hard for years to be relevant but still isn't.  And they threw away a good chance to buy WebOS (linux based--and let HP buy it) and threw away their partnership with Intel on MeeGo (another decent linux-based platform).  Windows on a phone! What are they thinking!]

Let me just wrap up with the following observation.  In my time with the iphone I’ve downloaded a bunch of apps from Apple’s app store. At first I was dazzled by most of them, and what I could do with that device.  But after three years I find that I’ve only been using about 6 of them regularly: phone, maps, camera, book reader, music player, voice recorder.  Occasional internet use, to look something up, or run skype.  I just prefer to get on something with a bigger screen and a keyboard to read the web for any serious length of time, or do any kind of writing of more than a few characters.  So when I really looked hard at what I was actually using the phone for, those things, along with battery life, became the most important selling points.  On that score the N8 does pretty well.  Nevertheless, I’ll be keeping my eye out for an iphone or android phone that has a good camera in the future.  They are coming!

February 26, 2011

A Linux-Based Photography Workflow (Part 6: Printing)

Filed under: floss, linux, photography, printing, process, products, tools, workflow — Tags: , , , , — Eric Jeschke @ 10:01 pm

This is part of a series of posts on Linux-based software tools for a photography workflow. Please read that first if you are coming to this series fresh–it will provide the necessary background information to explain the purpose of this series. In this particular post I’ll talk about image printing.

HP 9180

If all you wanted to do was put your photographs online, there would be less doubt about Linux as a platform for doing serious photography. But most photographers, sooner or later, will want to make prints. Of course, this can be outsourced to an online or local printing service, which is a very interesting and reasonable proposition for some folks, especially if you do not print frequently. Running even a small photo quality printer adds a level of complexity and cost to the workflow that is usually disproportionate to it’s contribution to the whole. For some photographers, however, just being able to produce a print instantly and to have the ultimate control over the printing, justifies the expense and trouble.

Although digital photo printing has come a long way, it is still a bit of a black art on any OS. There are just so many variables to control, including paper types, printer drivers, color management, profiles, application settings, etc. For many years I did all my workflow on Linux except for printing: when it came time to print I would copy the finished files over to my Mac, fire up Photoshop, open the image and invoke a special plug in to handle the printing. I can remember how much work it was just to get that working (on a Mac no less, where color management is built into everything) and how many test prints I made and different profiles downloaded and tried. In 2011, as I write this, it is still the case that you cannot really get away from putting in the time making a bunch of test prints to really figure out the process, no matter what the platform.

It always bugged me a bit to have to go through the final step with the Mac, and Photoshop was just so big and bloated that I often wished I could just print somehow directly from Linux. Unfortunately, in those days color management was not as solid in the different apps on Linux and printer drivers also were not always up to the quality of the manufacturer supplied ones for Mac or Windows. But these last barriers have been falling like dominoes, and I’m pleased to report that recently my workflow went all Linux–printing being the final piece to fall in to place. And I’m going to tell you how I did it.

If you own one of the more popular Epson or Canon photo printers out there, you should likely look to gutenprint for your photo printing needs. This is a solid driver with great community support and a good integration with the gimp as well as various other applications. Unfortunately, my printer, the HP 9180, is not supported by gutenprint or even by HP with open-source Linux drivers (even though they are pretty good at supporting most of their other printers under Linux), so I was forced to go looking elsewhere for a solution.

Turboprint Printer Monitor

The solution that I found was turboprint. Turboprint is a commercial product for Linux-based systems that provides printer drivers for hundreds of printers, GUI based dialogs for configuration, monitoring and maintenance, and a GIMP plug in for printing. The package can be downloaded and tried out for 30 days with full functionality to see if it works for your system. I found that it installed quickly and painlessly on Ubuntu 10.04. Once installed, a GUI configuration walks you through setting up the printer, and after that it just appears as a printer like any other on your system. You can then print to it from any application that supports printing. The install also includes a plug-in for the GIMP that provides some convenient features for tweaking print settings directly from inside the plug-in GUI. Although I still had to make a handful of test prints to figure out the proper settings, it was pretty easy for me this time around, perhaps because I’ve been down that road before on the Mac and worked out the strategy there. That is too long a story to go into here, but might be the topic of another post sometime. For now, I’ll just say that the main thing is to get the correct ICC profiles in the right places and then experiment with the settings between the application and the printer driver, changing only one variable at a time. Once I was satisfied that I was getting prints that matched what I saw onscreen in the GIMP and geeqie, I felt that the price of around $82 USD (studio version) was not too bad for being able to work comfortably under Linux. Not only that, but the quality of the prints seems every bit as good as I was getting from the Photoshop plugin on the Mac.

Photoprint

I want to mention one more application that I use for printing, but to do so I have to digress just a bit to talk about printing in the way old days. Back before I did printing on the Mac, I did printing under Windows, using a program called Qimage Pro. This was a splendid little program that excelled at one thing: printing multiple photographs on a sheet of inkjet paper. When I switched to the Mac for printing I sorely missed this little gem of a program. The good news is that I’ve found the near equivalent now that I’m printing under Linux: it’s called photoprint, and it’s classic GPL open source goodness! The author’s web site has lots of really useful information and it’s clear he has some good experience doing high quality imaging under Linux. photoprint has many really useful features, including full support for color management, various layout options, drag and drop and high quality downsampling. You can set up custom presets, which makes it a breeze to change print sizes. By default photoprint seems set up to print via gutenprint. To use it with turboprint I simply made a preset to turn off any color correction, set a correct monitor profile and NO printer profile (turboprint applies the profile in the driver). This is really a splendid little app and the main way I now print under Linux. Highly recommended.

A Linux-Based Photography Workflow (Part 5: Scanning)

Filed under: articles, floss, linux, process, products, scanners, scanning, tools, workflow — Tags: , , , — Eric Jeschke @ 3:38 pm

This is part of a series of posts on Linux-based software tools for a photography workflow. Please read that first if you are coming to this series fresh–it will provide the necessary background information to explain the purpose of this series.

In this part I move on to the topic of scanning. If you are a new digital-based photographer you might not have any need for this information, but if you shoot and scan film, or like me, are old enough to have old stocks of slides and negatives from the pre-digital days, you may want to scan these so that you can integrate them into a digital archive or print workflow. I’m on my second film scanner. The model I’m currently using is the Epson Perfection 700, a flatbed scanner that has some inserts for batch scanning a number of slides or negative strips at once. The resolution is high enough on this scanner that it is more than sufficient for the lenses and technique that I used back in the film days. Here is a picture of the scanner all loaded up with a set of 12 slides.

Epson V700 w/Batch Slide Holder

I’m going to cheat a little bit again and point to some older posts that I wrote about my scanning workflow almost exactly two years ago. The posts are still highly relevant, since I haven’t changed my scanning workflow one iota since then and I constantly refer back to those posts as reminders when I fire up my scanning workflow. Without further ado, part 1, part 2 and addendum.

For those who don’t wish to follow up all that information in one go, here is a basic summary:
In my early days of scanning, I quickly settled on a commercial program called VueScan, by Ed Hamrick. He sells a version of the program for Linux, Mac and Windows. It looks and behaves more or less identically across all the platforms. Although the price has gone up a bit since those days, this is still a very good product at a reasonable price. I looked at the open source alternatives such as xsane, etc., but they just didn’t match up with the feature set and workflow potential of vuescan. As you can see from the posts, there are many, many settings–this is not a program for novice users. It has a steep learning curve, but once you have mastered it the reward is an efficient, powerful and flexible scanning workflow that is almost unrivaled by any other scanning program period. The posts above describe a two step workflow that results in the RAW scans being saved, and then subsequently “developed”. The key thing here is that if you perform the first pass correctly you never have to go through the tedious scanning process again–like camera RAW files, you can reprocess the scanner RAWs as many times as you like from the hard drive. My second pass is usually to process the RAWs into TIFFs (again using vuescan), and after that I can edit them using GIMP or Raw Therapee for further processing, or run a batch operation using ImageMagick to sharpen, possibly downsample and convert to JPEG for the web.

VueScan 1

Excellent product, highly recommended. According to his web site, there is now a decent book describing a workflow using vuescan, and I only wish that had been around when I was learning it. As it was I remember scouring quite a few web pages and a suffered a few false starts before I finally figured out the subtleties of the program and how to make the most of it.  Nothing like having to scan the same batch of slides again and again to encourage you to figure out how to avoid those mistakes.

VueScan 2

Older Posts »

Theme: Shocking Blue Green. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.