Red Skies at Night

January 24, 2012

When Digital is like Film, but not really

Filed under: noted, photography, photos, products, scanning — Tags: , — Eric Jeschke @ 11:19 pm

Cliff Walk

Key: R20111225-161731

Nokia N8 phone cam–a digital image.

I am so sick of hearing the film vs. digital debate.  I’m sure painters don’t argue whether oils or acrylics are better, so why do photographers need to endlessly debate which medium is better? Just pick one, or better both, and get out there and do some photography, dammit!

Ok, rant off. I’m just tired of reading about it still in 2012.

In a similar vein, I don’t know if you have seen this new product? Go ahead, check out the link and then come back….hm, hm, hm….

If you want the film look, then for God’s sake, why not shoot film?

Personally, I don’t get it. I like the look of digital. I never was a big fan of film grain, which always mucked up my scans, and I never much liked the limited dynamic range of transparency film or the color all that much. (Ok, Kodachrome 64 was a little special, I admit). I never shot much negative film, so I don’t have a reference there. But after 20-some years of shooting slides, and being a computer guy, I was so ready for digital to arrive. I just don’t understand products that are trying to emulate a particular film look, or to add fake grain, etc.  Why not embrace the medium for what it is?

Anyway, this should not be construed in any way as a rant against film. If you love it–God bless you–have at it. And I guess if you want the convenience of digital with the look of film, this kind of product is for you–go for it.

Just remember folks, if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck–but it isn’t a duck–at some point the ruse is going to show through.

[As an aside: I can remember clearly several jurors from past Hawaii Photo Expos, who, upon examining a framed print up close during a photo critique, turn to the photographer and ask "Is that film?"--and then look disappointed when the answer is in the negative.  As if suddenly the image that they liked and picked for the show has proven to be a cheap fake.  I cannot for the life of me understand that state of mind.  The image should stand on its own.  As others have said elsewhere: "No one cares how hard you worked on it".]

 

February 26, 2011

A Linux-Based Photography Workflow (Part 5: Scanning)

Filed under: articles, floss, linux, process, products, scanners, scanning, tools, workflow — Tags: , , , — Eric Jeschke @ 3:38 pm

This is part of a series of posts on Linux-based software tools for a photography workflow. Please read that first if you are coming to this series fresh–it will provide the necessary background information to explain the purpose of this series.

In this part I move on to the topic of scanning. If you are a new digital-based photographer you might not have any need for this information, but if you shoot and scan film, or like me, are old enough to have old stocks of slides and negatives from the pre-digital days, you may want to scan these so that you can integrate them into a digital archive or print workflow. I’m on my second film scanner. The model I’m currently using is the Epson Perfection 700, a flatbed scanner that has some inserts for batch scanning a number of slides or negative strips at once. The resolution is high enough on this scanner that it is more than sufficient for the lenses and technique that I used back in the film days. Here is a picture of the scanner all loaded up with a set of 12 slides.

Epson V700 w/Batch Slide Holder

I’m going to cheat a little bit again and point to some older posts that I wrote about my scanning workflow almost exactly two years ago. The posts are still highly relevant, since I haven’t changed my scanning workflow one iota since then and I constantly refer back to those posts as reminders when I fire up my scanning workflow. Without further ado, part 1, part 2 and addendum.

For those who don’t wish to follow up all that information in one go, here is a basic summary:
In my early days of scanning, I quickly settled on a commercial program called VueScan, by Ed Hamrick. He sells a version of the program for Linux, Mac and Windows. It looks and behaves more or less identically across all the platforms. Although the price has gone up a bit since those days, this is still a very good product at a reasonable price. I looked at the open source alternatives such as xsane, etc., but they just didn’t match up with the feature set and workflow potential of vuescan. As you can see from the posts, there are many, many settings–this is not a program for novice users. It has a steep learning curve, but once you have mastered it the reward is an efficient, powerful and flexible scanning workflow that is almost unrivaled by any other scanning program period. The posts above describe a two step workflow that results in the RAW scans being saved, and then subsequently “developed”. The key thing here is that if you perform the first pass correctly you never have to go through the tedious scanning process again–like camera RAW files, you can reprocess the scanner RAWs as many times as you like from the hard drive. My second pass is usually to process the RAWs into TIFFs (again using vuescan), and after that I can edit them using GIMP or Raw Therapee for further processing, or run a batch operation using ImageMagick to sharpen, possibly downsample and convert to JPEG for the web.

VueScan 1

Excellent product, highly recommended. According to his web site, there is now a decent book describing a workflow using vuescan, and I only wish that had been around when I was learning it. As it was I remember scouring quite a few web pages and a suffered a few false starts before I finally figured out the subtleties of the program and how to make the most of it.  Nothing like having to scan the same batch of slides again and again to encourage you to figure out how to avoid those mistakes.

VueScan 2

January 4, 2010

Turn of the Year Thoughts

Dreamscape

Key: R20091219-142547

As we pass from one year/decade into the next it seems natural to reflect on the year left behind and the year ahead.  I certainly have been doing my fair share of that, especially since the last week of the year has had a few vacation days attached and I’ve had calmer days to let thoughts wander and reorganize themselves. I’ve noticed that a lot of bloggers are sharing their thoughts, so I will too.  But I’ll try not to ramble too much!

2009 was a typical year of photography for me in that I didn’t have enough time for it.  The pressing needs of husband, father and provider came first, as they should, and everything else was catch as catch can.  Nevertheless, there were some interesting developments for me.

On the picturing side, opportunities were largely made around weekends, holidays, vacation days, business trips to other cities and the occasional outing with the local photo club. I continue my trend away from nature photography (present picture excepted!) toward more candid, portrait, “street” and still life picturing. I produced my second book (thanks again, SoFoBoMo!) and along the way found a very interesting new process for making the book that saved me a ton of computer face time. This led to a further exploration of the technique for producing folios. And although I didn’t make massive headway on it, I have spent a lot more time thinking about sets and series of images, themes and more intentional picturing, and it is beginning to have an impact on my work that is leading me in good directions, artistically.

On the equipment side, I found myself largely making the switch from serious compacts with 1/1.8 sensors to the m4/3 format with a much larger sensor.  This really only happened after I acquired a 20mm pancake lens, which made the larger camera small enough to meet my carry along cut-off weight/size.  The new sensor and lens made for some different picturing possibilities than I had been making, and I found myself returning to familiar 50mm SLR type photography, albeit not with a Pentax MX, but a tiny computer with a lens attached. And it wasn’t nearly as bad as it sounds.  New equipment can be an enabler of sorts, and I certainly enjoyed exploring with the new gear.  I also managed to scan a fair number of old slides and via the learning process established a powerful and consistent scanning workflow.

On the technical/photo processing side, I continue to use the Linux and Mac environments for photo developing and organization.  I discovered a couple of really great apps for the Linux environment for developing (jpeg/raw) and photo viewing and organizing. On the Mac side I’ve been playing with DNG profiles, raw conversion, LightRoom 3beta and of course printing (I still print from Photoshop).  I got a new wide-gamut monitor with a profiling device and finally moved away from manufacturer’s canned profiles to my own.  I haven’t blogged about too many of these things yet (mostly because I don’t find technical posts as interesting as other aspects of photography), but I may talk about some of these developments in the weeks ahead.

On the inspiration side, I visited the Yousef Karsh exhibit at the Art Institute in Chicago, entered two local photo/art show call-for-entries and got pieces accepted, attended a critique, sat on the board of another photo contest, attended several art show openings, and attended about half of the photo shoots and meetings of the local photography club.  I tried to read a couple of books on the creative process, but got bored. I read a (probably) unhealthy number of photographers blog posts and browsed a lot of online work. I posted a lot of photos and a few words now and then on my own blog and enjoyed some very pleasant exchanges with other bloggers (you know who you are!). I had a print swap with another blogger (Thanks, Kjell!).  I participated in a small invitation-only online photography critique group (which I liked a lot), until the owner decided to shut it down. Oh, and I sold exactly one photo on the internet. :-)

Wow, looking back it sounds like I accomplished a lot, but somehow I always want more photography!

Looking ahead, here’s what I see for 2010 in Eric’s photographic journey:

Picturing: I want to really put a concerted effort into themed work.  I’ll probably still be posting a fair bit of come-what-may, but there is going to be more intentional picturing making.  This could be bad, if it makes me feel forced, but I’m going to try to do it in clever ways that don’t get me into that corner.  And I’m going to schedule some days for pure photography.  I’m also planning to dabble in a little video (courtesy of the GH1), but nothing too serious.  Expect some more “formal” portraits. I’ll make another book.  I’d like to produce at least one good folio on interesting paper.

Equipment: I’ll be continuing to explore the GH1 and the normal prime as my main photo machine. I may try some more iPhone photos as a kind of explicit toy-camera like effect, but I don’t expect too much here, I found the lack of any basic exposure controls somewhat frustrating.  I don’t expect any major new camera purchases (never say never!), but perhaps a new lens may show up some day.  I’ll continue my scanning of old material and hope to make some good progress on completing it.

Processing/Technical: more experimentation along the vectors I’m currently exploring as described above.  I’m currently into a fairly minimalist processing regime, and I don’t expect too much change there, although I’ve been playing with raw development a bit more and may try to settle into some custom raw processing profiles (tone curves, etc).  I want to print and frame more work this year.  I’ll be ordering a bunch of new papers and testing them out.  On the blogging side, I’m pretty happy with the outsourced WordPress blog (after years of maintaining my own web sites) and will probably stick with that.  I renewed my Flickr Pro membership for two more years, but I also signed up with SmugMug (and transferred the Flickr sets over with SmuggLr) because I’ve grown tired of Flickr stagnating; it seems that integration into Yahoo sucked all the creative life out of it, and there has been almost no new development on it.  After the dust settles I’ll be with one or the other.  I’ll probably drop my Imagekind Pro account as it hasn’t been much use for any of the uses I originally envisioned it for (and that includes a few things that SmugMug does); it also appears to be languishing after absorption by CafePress.  I may blog about a couple of these decisions if there is interest.

Inspiration: I will be entering more photo contests/shows this year.  It would be interesting to attend a workshop if I can spare the time. I’ll continue to try and attend as many openings as I can because I find viewing art of any kind inspirational, and photographs take a whole new aura in print.  I’m going to pay more attention to the cinematography in the few films I will see.  I’ll continue to blog and post work (of course!) as well as try to keep up with a reasonable core set of blogs. I’d like to do more print swaps with other photographers, if I can find any willing participants.  And I’d like to participate again in a small, private, online critique group (anyone know of any openings?)

Whew!

Well, maybe I didn’t succeed on the avoidance of rambling.  Nevertheless, a fairly decent summary of what was and what is likely, vis-a-vis Eric.  I sincerely hope that you, Dear Reader, will continue to enjoy and prosper in your photographic journey in 2010.  I look forward to another year of contact, learning, ideas and inspiration. Cheers!

October 28, 2009

Summer of Fun 1992

Filed under: inspiration, photos, scanning — Tags: — Eric Jeschke @ 10:57 pm

Shiprock Lake, ID

Key: ID1992_0054

Nothing much new happening here.  Working too much, not enough time for photography.  I’ve finished another round of scanning, though, a summer of backpacking in 1992.  I cringe to look at some of the photos that I long thought were good.  Check out that tilted horizon!  Not that I have anything against tilted horizons, but they should be intentional.   I suppose in another 15-20 years I’ll look at my current photography and cringe some more.  Then again, maybe not.  Such is the journey.

Well, it’s nice to get the photographs scanned decently in to digital format, where I can access them more readily.  The slide projector was given away long ago.  Now I just need to spend a few nights fixing up tilted horizons…or maybe not.  We’ll see.

These photos bring back fond memories of the summer of fun 1992.  My then girlfriend (now wife) and I went backpacking for most of the summer in Idaho, Montana and Alberta.  This photo was taken only a couple of days into an 11-day backpacking trip in the River of No Return Wilderness, Idaho, the largest roadless area in the lower 48 states.  It was a phenomenal trip and cemented a bond between us. How cool to have a girlfriend that loves backpacking!   I can only dream now of doing an 11 day trip.  Our packs were so heavy with 11 days worth of food and enough water to get us between streams in that somewhat arid land.  This high country was early in the trip and things got hotter as we descended from the alpine lakes to the rivers.  That was some wild country, and we scarcely saw anyone except a few rafting parties on the river.  I remember when we got out there was a little camping supplies shop where we bought a couple of big ice cream cones.  Any other time they would have been great, but after 11 days of backpacking and light eating in the hot sun it seemed so heavy and unnatural inside once I’d finished it.  I couldn’t keep it down.

October 4, 2009

Folios: Templates Updated

Filed under: books, photos, printing, process, scanning — Tags: , , , , — Eric Jeschke @ 9:21 pm

Amy with Sea Arch, West Coast Trail, British Columbia

Key: BC1995-0028

I finally got around to updating the Blurb POD latex templates to include the folio templates as well.  Both the book and web versions feed off of the same images in two different resolutions: 144dpi for web and 300dpi for print.  So the same master images can create four documents: book (web), book (blurb), folio(web) and folio (print).  Pretty nifty trick I say.  Get `em while they’re hot!

In other news, I finally got my desk cleaned off and I found a scanner under there.  Actually, I knew it was under there somewhere and that was my main impetus to clean.  I’m getting ready for another round of scanning.

March 14, 2009

Scanning, again

Filed under: articles, photos, process, scanners, scanning, workflow — Tags: , , , , , , — Eric Jeschke @ 10:11 pm

Untitled

Well, sorry to go on so long about this, but I keep adjusting my work flow to fit the changing requirements of the images, and I thought I would keep you informed. If you are coming to this fresh, you might have a look at post 1, post 2 and post 3 first.

The earlier slide sets I had been scanning had a lot of water horizon shots, and because tilted water horizons bug me (unless trying for that effect), I felt the need to rotate the scanned images to level, and so I set the “Border (%)” parameter of Vuescan to 5% to give me essentially an extra bit of space for cropping around the fairly good auto crop selection, since I was rotating and cropping manually afterward. The rotations were often minor, and due to slight slide mismount or angled position in the batch slide holder as, or more often than, photographer composition errors.

However with the more recent sets (photo here a typical example from one) I feel no urgent need to rotate. Indeed, I’d be hard pressed to figure out which way to rotate and how much, without a level horizon to guide me. So I began setting the “Border (%)” setting to -1%, in order to crop off the slight black borders that were being included in the automatically selected crop (it’s fairly conservative about your borders). This yields sets in which I don’t have to manually post process every picture afterward, but only the occasional one. Again, just to be clear, this is in the second pass from scanned RAWs to baked TIFFs. I’m still including the 5% extra border in the initial scans to RAW, just to be safe. And having the RAWs on disk means I can rescan the entire set to TIFF without loading a slide, in a fraction of the time. Sweetness.

Again, using the load/save settings feature of Vuescan made it easy to save these settings under the name “raw-scans-to-cropped-tiffs”.

Older Posts »

Theme: Shocking Blue Green. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.