Red Skies at Night

January 8, 2012

On Folio Enclosures

Filed under: printing, process, photography — Tags: , , — Eric Jeschke @ 4:51 pm

DIY Folio Enclosure : Back

Key: R20120108-145856-levels

I am finishing up the final physical production of my most recent folio Occupy Seattle 2011. For this folio I am putting forth my highest level of craftsmanship to date to see what I can achieve in this expression of photography–the folio. That means the best printing I could do, the best paper, the best enclosure.

For the first time I decided to make my own enclosure. I made it out of heavy art paper. The local craft store is pretty limited in terms of heavy art papers, so I had to settle for this shade of grey. I employed a pretty basic wrap-up design and with a fair amount of precise measuring and cutting I managed to produce this enclosure. It’s far from perfect, but I’m pretty satisfied with the result. It was fairly labor intensive to make it, but I am considering how I could simplify the process for future folios. Something as simple as tracing the outline to make a template might work out.

I thought I would show you, Dear Readers, how the folio looks as a finished object, and how it opens up. This is all part of the experience of the folio: like unwrapping a tastefully wrapped present to see what’s inside.

DIY Folio Enclosure : Front [1]

Key: R20120108-150118-levels

DIY Folio Enclosure : Front [2]

Key: R20120108-150128-levels

Note the velcro dots to seal the enclosure. I had originally cut a slit to use a flap/slit style closure, but the velcro is easier on the paper flap, more secure and will probably last longer.

DIY Folio Enclosure : Front [3]

Key: R20120108-150143-levels

DIY Folio Enclosure : Front [4]

Key: R20120108-150158-levels

DIY Folio Enclosure : Front [5]

Key: R20120108-150214-levels

Note the cloth ribbon. This aids in picking up the stack of leaves, separating them from the mount board beneath.

DIY Folio Enclosure : Back Construction [1]

Key: R20120108-161000-levels

I am always thinking about reuse. This design employs a cutout in the back so that you could reuse the enclosure for any kind of folio. There is simply an additional print that goes upside down in the back that shows the folio image and title information through the cutouts.

DIY Folio Enclosure : Back Construction [2]

Key: R20120108-161117-levels

DIY Folio Enclosure : Back Construction [3]

Key: R20120108-161139-levels

A stiff piece of mount board goes on top of the upside down print to add rigidity to the enclosure. Note the cloth ribbon attached at left.

Occupy Seattle 2011 Folio

Key: R20120108-150739-levels

Voila!

December 2, 2011

More Folio Activity and Musings on Prints

Filed under: archiving, noted, photography, photos, POD, printing, web — Tags: , , , — Eric Jeschke @ 10:46 pm

The Clothes Pin Solution

Key: R20111130-085248

My box of Hahnemuhle Ultra Smooth Photo Rag showed up a couple of weeks ago and I made a couple of test prints from the Occupy Seattle folio.  I was not overly impressed.  The dmax of the blacks was no where near where I was expecting it.   I was rather surprised, given how much I had liked the look of the prints on the regular Photo Rag.  Then I realized that it was my friend Robbyn who had printed the sample on Photo Rag, not me (she had printed about 3 of the dozen+ or so samples that I had).  I began to suspect a printer profile issue.  As these things can take a while to sort out, I decided to spring for a box of my other current fave paper, which I know that I have printed on, Ilford Galerie Gold Fibre Silk. That box came in a couple of days ago and I ran off a couple of test prints from the folio.  Wow, they looked great!  Seeing this I went ahead and started printing the whole thing…

…and the aggravation of home fine art inkjet printing came home to roost again. This time I discovered that some of the prints would, at the very tail end of the paper, twist a little on their way out of the printer, and this would cause the bottom bit of text to smear a little.  All the images were fine, because they finished above the point where the paper left the security of the rear rollers.  It was only some papers, possibly ones that were a little more curled, when the print was being pulled by the front rollers only and printing the image key and page number in the last inch or so of the paper.

For a while I thought that maybe I could fix it by simply guiding the paper in a straight path.  I tried using a clothespin clamped on to the manual feed shelf, as shown in the photo here.  It worked for a little while, but then the problem just exhibited itself in a different way as the paper simply slipped under the wheels and got printed on multiple times.  Googling a bit, I discovered that this is a known issue with this printer and certain papers (or under certain conditions–curled?) fed through the manual feed path.  I’d never seen it before because I was used to feeding much larger sheets of paper (A3+) through that path, or using the tray feed for slimmer papers.  The possible solutions I’ve seen online do not look good.  This is the kind of thing that leads to a love/hate relationship with home inkjet printing.  When it works, it’s glorious, and when it doesn’t, it’s frustration in spades.  I’m mulling over a couple of more things to try of my own design–wish me luck.

A Fine Print is a Beautiful Thing to Behold

Key: R20111202-222227

Before I got frustrated, I was positively glowing looking at the prints.  It’s always rewarding to see one of your images on a new paper. The photography world is collectively pondering if the end of the print as a destination is near, and we are all going to be looking at prints on our iPads or Kindles or what not.  Those certainly are attractive devices for browsing photography.  And I would not have to deal with the expense and hassles of an inkjet printer.  But I have to say that for this photographer at least, the print still reigns supreme.  The richness of the blacks, the subtle gradations in tonality, the resolution…my god, the detail!  Nothing quite like it.  And to think that with proper care it might last 200 years or more–archival as well.

October 16, 2011

Testing, 1, 2, 3, Testing, …

Filed under: photography, printing, products, reviews — Tags: , — Eric Jeschke @ 11:01 pm

Folio Test Prints

Key: R20111016-211829-levels

I spent my Saturday of this weekend doing test prints for a new folio I am making of the Occupy Seattle set. For this folio I am looking at all possible ways to print it: do it myself (again) or outsource it. As you can see from the photograph, I made a lot of test prints on a bunch of different papers (I picked up a couple fine-art paper sample packs in Seattle). Here are the ones I tested with:

From Hahnemuhle:

  • Fine Art Pearl, 285 gsm
  • Photo Rag, 308 gsm
  • Photo Rag Satin, 310 gsm
  • Photo Rag Baryta, 315 gsm
  • Photo Rag Pearl, 320 gsm
  • Fine Art Baryta, 325 gsm
  • Baryta FB, 350 gsm
  • Bamboo, 290 gsm

Misc other:

  • Ilford Galerie Fibre Gloss Silk (Baryta), 310 gsm
  • Epson Enhanced Matte, 192 gsm
  • Office Max Professional Matte, 220 gsm

I also made a couple of comparison prints with glossy and semigloss papers for comparison.  Finally, just to see how it would look if I outsourced it on the cheap, I stopped by Office Max and had them print on three samples that looked vaguely like they might be ok.  Those turned out to be junk compared to the good papers, and you can see how they compare (they are the three in the lower right)–no comparison on the dmax.  The cheap Epson and Office Max matte papers that I tried printing on myself looked better, but were still no match for the Hahnemuhle or Ilford papers.

Cost-wise, it is looking like the following:

If I outsource it to my fine-art printer (a woman who runs a gallery/print shop and does excellent work), she is going to print it from a roll and then cut it into sheets.  She prints almost exclusively the Hahnemuhle papers, but she has only about half of the ones I tested.  This would end up being my most expensive option, but might look the best.   To my eye her printer is very subtly better than mine by a tiny bit–perhaps just a little less bronzing on some papers if you look at them at an acute angle.  But then again the examples I had her do looked a bit curled (cut from a roll) even though we had put them in a heat press for a bit to flatten them out.  This would be the most expensive option.

I could print it myself on my printer.  My printer does a very nice job, for the most part.  But I usually use it to print one-off exhibition prints, if they are not too large.  It has the advantage that I can feed standard cut sheets via the straight-thru path and this makes them come out nice and flat.  However, I’ve noticed that if I crank a whole folio through it that sometimes I’ll get a small ink smudge here or there in the middle of the run that contaminates the margin on a few sheets.  Not a big deal if framing, but a hassle for a folio.  On the whole this option is moderately priced–fine-art 8.5×11 sheets are around $1 in bulk plus a few cents for ink.  For a folio of 24 pages I might be looking at around a $25 cost.

Ideally what I’d really like is to find someone who could print it for a reasonable margin over what I am paying.  For example, if I could find someone who could print it on one of the fine-art papers for around $50 plus shipping, I would go for it.  From what I’ve seen online I don’t think there is such a place.  If you know of one, let me know!

Of all the papers, I think my favorite so far is Ilford Galerie Gold Fibre Silk.  It is stiff without being too thick or heavy, has excellent blacks, just a hint of texture and it is slightly warm (probably no OBAs).  This is really a killer paper.

The Hahnemuhle Baryta FB is a close second.  It’s as good on the blacks, but is just slightly too thick and stiff at 350 gsm.  The surface texture is also more visible and the surface shows a bit more sheen when held at an angle.  It’s also more bright white, if you are into that.

Photo Rag is a classic.  The blacks are not as good as on the Baryta papers, but it is pure rag, baby–the feel in the hand is gorgeous.  Also, there is no bronzing or sheen at ANY angle.  It’s like a matte paper but with much better dmax and a less distressed surface.  It is also a warm white, which I happen to like.  If you like a bit of gloss, the Photo Rag Satin is a good alternative–same basic look as Photo Rag, but with a bit more stiffness and a fine surface sheen.

I think for this folio it is going to come down to either the Ilford GFGS or the Photo Rag, depending on whether I want a slightly more classic darkroom look or an art-print look, respectively.

What a choice of papers we having for printing these days.  It’s wonderful!

October 2, 2011

Twilight Football Practice

Filed under: photography, photos, printing, products — Eric Jeschke @ 2:36 pm

Twilight Football Practice

Key: R20110930-180007-master

Hey Folks,
Wally World (aka Wal-Mart) is offering a free 16×20 poster with the use of a coupon. Offer ends at the end of October, so grab it while it’s good. (Via PetaPixel)

February 26, 2011

A Linux-Based Photography Workflow (Part 6: Printing)

Filed under: floss, linux, photography, printing, process, products, tools, workflow — Tags: , , , , — Eric Jeschke @ 10:01 pm

This is part of a series of posts on Linux-based software tools for a photography workflow. Please read that first if you are coming to this series fresh–it will provide the necessary background information to explain the purpose of this series. In this particular post I’ll talk about image printing.

HP 9180

If all you wanted to do was put your photographs online, there would be less doubt about Linux as a platform for doing serious photography. But most photographers, sooner or later, will want to make prints. Of course, this can be outsourced to an online or local printing service, which is a very interesting and reasonable proposition for some folks, especially if you do not print frequently. Running even a small photo quality printer adds a level of complexity and cost to the workflow that is usually disproportionate to it’s contribution to the whole. For some photographers, however, just being able to produce a print instantly and to have the ultimate control over the printing, justifies the expense and trouble.

Although digital photo printing has come a long way, it is still a bit of a black art on any OS. There are just so many variables to control, including paper types, printer drivers, color management, profiles, application settings, etc. For many years I did all my workflow on Linux except for printing: when it came time to print I would copy the finished files over to my Mac, fire up Photoshop, open the image and invoke a special plug in to handle the printing. I can remember how much work it was just to get that working (on a Mac no less, where color management is built into everything) and how many test prints I made and different profiles downloaded and tried. In 2011, as I write this, it is still the case that you cannot really get away from putting in the time making a bunch of test prints to really figure out the process, no matter what the platform.

It always bugged me a bit to have to go through the final step with the Mac, and Photoshop was just so big and bloated that I often wished I could just print somehow directly from Linux. Unfortunately, in those days color management was not as solid in the different apps on Linux and printer drivers also were not always up to the quality of the manufacturer supplied ones for Mac or Windows. But these last barriers have been falling like dominoes, and I’m pleased to report that recently my workflow went all Linux–printing being the final piece to fall in to place. And I’m going to tell you how I did it.

If you own one of the more popular Epson or Canon photo printers out there, you should likely look to gutenprint for your photo printing needs. This is a solid driver with great community support and a good integration with the gimp as well as various other applications. Unfortunately, my printer, the HP 9180, is not supported by gutenprint or even by HP with open-source Linux drivers (even though they are pretty good at supporting most of their other printers under Linux), so I was forced to go looking elsewhere for a solution.

Turboprint Printer Monitor

The solution that I found was turboprint. Turboprint is a commercial product for Linux-based systems that provides printer drivers for hundreds of printers, GUI based dialogs for configuration, monitoring and maintenance, and a GIMP plug in for printing. The package can be downloaded and tried out for 30 days with full functionality to see if it works for your system. I found that it installed quickly and painlessly on Ubuntu 10.04. Once installed, a GUI configuration walks you through setting up the printer, and after that it just appears as a printer like any other on your system. You can then print to it from any application that supports printing. The install also includes a plug-in for the GIMP that provides some convenient features for tweaking print settings directly from inside the plug-in GUI. Although I still had to make a handful of test prints to figure out the proper settings, it was pretty easy for me this time around, perhaps because I’ve been down that road before on the Mac and worked out the strategy there. That is too long a story to go into here, but might be the topic of another post sometime. For now, I’ll just say that the main thing is to get the correct ICC profiles in the right places and then experiment with the settings between the application and the printer driver, changing only one variable at a time. Once I was satisfied that I was getting prints that matched what I saw onscreen in the GIMP and geeqie, I felt that the price of around $82 USD (studio version) was not too bad for being able to work comfortably under Linux. Not only that, but the quality of the prints seems every bit as good as I was getting from the Photoshop plugin on the Mac.

Photoprint

I want to mention one more application that I use for printing, but to do so I have to digress just a bit to talk about printing in the way old days. Back before I did printing on the Mac, I did printing under Windows, using a program called Qimage Pro. This was a splendid little program that excelled at one thing: printing multiple photographs on a sheet of inkjet paper. When I switched to the Mac for printing I sorely missed this little gem of a program. The good news is that I’ve found the near equivalent now that I’m printing under Linux: it’s called photoprint, and it’s classic GPL open source goodness! The author’s web site has lots of really useful information and it’s clear he has some good experience doing high quality imaging under Linux. photoprint has many really useful features, including full support for color management, various layout options, drag and drop and high quality downsampling. You can set up custom presets, which makes it a breeze to change print sizes. By default photoprint seems set up to print via gutenprint. To use it with turboprint I simply made a preset to turn off any color correction, set a correct monitor profile and NO printer profile (turboprint applies the profile in the driver). This is really a splendid little app and the main way I now print under Linux. Highly recommended.

May 24, 2010

More folio activity

Filed under: printing, workshops — Tags: , , , , — Eric Jeschke @ 9:41 am

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

Last weekend’s effort to get the kinks worked out of my printing process on matte has enabled me to finish my folio for the photography workshop coming up next weekend in conjunction with the Hawai`i Photo Expo.  Good thing too because I have a busy week ahead and would have had no time to work on it.

I am pretty happy with the result, given the time constraints I had.  I ended up using some matte paper stocks that weren’t quite as nice as I would have liked, but they are decent.  I didn’t have time to order more, and living on a sparsely-populated island in the pacific ocean there just isn’t that much in the way of fine-art paper selection at the local stores.

I’m still planning to work on a better folio case, but this presentation case that I got from Office Max was not bad looking, and makes a decent wrap.  I have enough photos to do a color one as well, but I don’t think I’ll get that done in time for the workshop, and it would be a few too many photos to bring for review anyway.

The selection process for this folio was an interesting exercise that I’m looking forward to spending some more time doing.  After about a week of on and off thought about it I decided that putting together a themed folio would be best, but I need much more time on the selection process than I can give to that right now.  Instead I settled on a plan to make several “best of” folios by year.  Doing it this way made it manageable, because I could reasonably go through a year’s worth of photography and make some selects in a few days.

I selected somewhere around 50 photographs for the initial cut for Folio ONE 2009.  After pondering these for a while I decided to not to mix B&W and color, and not to mix radically different aspect ratios.  This led me to select 15 photographs in B&W square format, plus a cover image and a back matter image.  Following the very good advice here, 15-17 seems like a good number.  Printing on these thicker matte stocks I think I would never go higher than 25 anyway, it’s just too much.  Probably if I was going to do something more serious with this folio I’d cut it down even more to the best 10-12 images.

All in all a great learning experience, and I’m looking forward to the feedback (good or bad) at the workshop.  I’ll post the online version of the folio following the workshop and a report on that.

Older Posts »

Theme: Shocking Blue Green. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.