Red Skies at Night

January 31, 2012

An Observation on Life

Filed under: life, photography, photos — Eric Jeschke @ 9:00 pm

Life

Key: R20120129-171946

Nothing great to show today, just an observation on Life.

I live next to a rain forest and all kinds of stuff grows up there very rapidly. A lot of trees will grow up in just a few months, instead of years. Most folks around here call this specimen here a “trash tree”, because it is not native, does not produce anything, is not ornamental, it just grows fast and reproduces fast. I am often cutting these down in my yard because I don’t want them competing with my other trees for nutrients or shading them out or what not.

I have noticed that with this species in particular, even if I chop the thing up into logs, if I toss the logs back into the jungle next door then each one will put down roots and begin growing a new tree! Kind of scary, actually. Well, after I cut this sapling down, I thought I would just throw it by the side of my driveway and let it sit in the sun and exposed for a few weeks to get thoroughly dried out and then I would throw it over the fence. That should take care of it!

Well, I was doing yard work last weekend and noticed the log. It was growing branches! Look at the end here–it is completely scarred. There are no roots to speak of; it is just growing branches into the air out of the old trunk. When I saw this I thought to myself that this illustrates perfectly what life on this earth is all about: a tenacious will to live, despite enormous odds.

It was just that kind of a weird day.  Earlier I had picked up a toad that was about to get weed whacked, and I noticed that it had an enormously swollen tick attached to it.  Curious; I thought ticks only bothered warm blooded creatures.  I guess if there is none around, cold blood is as good as warm.  I should have taken a photograph of it, but I felt so sorry for the toad that I plucked off the tick and popped it between my fingers.  Good old toad, helping me with my yard.  I put him in a nice, cool, safe spot and off he hopped.

Then, turning over an old pile of logs, I saw a huge centipede! I don’t know if you have ever been stung by a centipede, but it is bad, bad, bad.  Not like a hornet sting, but worse.  Like acid being poured on your skin–a kind of chemical burning sensation that comes and goes in waves long after the wound has been treated.  I was glad I was wearing gloves!  I brought one of my chickens over to see if she wanted it.  She gave it a few pecks to see what it was, and then walked away from it.  Probably figured it was too big of a mouthful, although I daresay she could have handled it.  She dispatched a Green Anole that I had caught for her earlier handily; perhaps she was just not hungry enough?

Green Chair Snooze

Key: R20120129-113320

And even though I am as tired of cat pictures as the next guy, still I cannot help myself sometimes. So as a “bonus” picture today you get a cat! I will tie it into the above by saying that the sapling has become my cats’ favorite scratching post while lying there beside the driveway. So not only did it suffer the deprivations of soil and water, but it was also ignominiously clawed severely by three cats!

January 24, 2012

When Digital is like Film, but not really

Filed under: noted, photography, photos, products, scanning — Tags: , — Eric Jeschke @ 11:19 pm

Cliff Walk

Key: R20111225-161731

Nokia N8 phone cam–a digital image.

I am so sick of hearing the film vs. digital debate.  I’m sure painters don’t argue whether oils or acrylics are better, so why do photographers need to endlessly debate which medium is better? Just pick one, or better both, and get out there and do some photography, dammit!

Ok, rant off. I’m just tired of reading about it still in 2012.

In a similar vein, I don’t know if you have seen this new product? Go ahead, check out the link and then come back….hm, hm, hm….

If you want the film look, then for God’s sake, why not shoot film?

Personally, I don’t get it. I like the look of digital. I never was a big fan of film grain, which always mucked up my scans, and I never much liked the limited dynamic range of transparency film or the color all that much. (Ok, Kodachrome 64 was a little special, I admit). I never shot much negative film, so I don’t have a reference there. But after 20-some years of shooting slides, and being a computer guy, I was so ready for digital to arrive. I just don’t understand products that are trying to emulate a particular film look, or to add fake grain, etc.  Why not embrace the medium for what it is?

Anyway, this should not be construed in any way as a rant against film. If you love it–God bless you–have at it. And I guess if you want the convenience of digital with the look of film, this kind of product is for you–go for it.

Just remember folks, if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck–but it isn’t a duck–at some point the ruse is going to show through.

[As an aside: I can remember clearly several jurors from past Hawaii Photo Expos, who, upon examining a framed print up close during a photo critique, turn to the photographer and ask "Is that film?"--and then look disappointed when the answer is in the negative.  As if suddenly the image that they liked and picked for the show has proven to be a cheap fake.  I cannot for the life of me understand that state of mind.  The image should stand on its own.  As others have said elsewhere: "No one cares how hard you worked on it".]

 

January 21, 2012

Opening the Door

Filed under: articles, inspiration, noted, photography, photos, web — Eric Jeschke @ 8:16 pm

Door

Key: R20120102-085212

I’ve been wrestling with the idea of making vs. taking photographs. Of course many photographers would say that even when they discover a “found” image they are making a photograph, due to all the creative things they are doing with the light, composition, etc. and on afterward into post processing. But I am talking about something much different–the difference between being inspired by a found image vs. coming up with an image in your head and then going out and realizing that–making it happen.

I really struggled with trying to figure out why it was so hard for me to make the latter kind of images. It’s something that I want to work on and develop, and I know that part of that is just putting in the time working that way until it is as comfortable as the other. But part of me was just not satisfied with not understanding the source of the difficulty.

Today I read a post by Brooks Jensen that neatly summarized probably the most important aspect of the problem. It is essentially the difference between photography and painting: in (found) photography you find an image and then you pare it down, element by element, subtracting things until you have the image close to what you “saw” in your head when it caught your eye. In painting you are doing the opposite: adding elements, until the scene is built up into something interesting. In short, it is a fundamentally different way of working. In the end you are exercising the same sorts of decisions and skills at the time of pressing the shutter, but the beginning part is so different that I am just not familiar with starting from that end.

I hope that I have articulated this well enough to get the point across. I know Brook’s post helped me understand at least one of the barriers standing in front of me that I could not see, and now seeing and understanding it, I might be able to make some more progress in getting over that barrier. It’s fair to say that painting lessons or other creative forms of art would probably be a huge help here, but my “art time” is limited. At least I can practice my “brush strokes” photographically.

January 18, 2012

Yet *more* Ninja

Filed under: life, photography, photos — Tags: — Eric Jeschke @ 10:31 pm

Ninja Portrait

Key: R20120118-175428-master

Following on the rather tenuous idea that you can never have too much Ninja on your blog, I give you another Ninja portrait.

Young Ninja

Filed under: life, photography, photos — Tags: — Eric Jeschke @ 10:11 pm
NinjaKey: R20120118-175410-master

Betcha didn’t know that Ninja’s wear bowler hats did you? Well it’s the 2010′s–and they do! They also wear rubber galoshes when they feel like it.

If you are nice they might pose for your camera. But they typically come out at dusk, so you have to be ready.

Young Ninja #2Key: R20120118-175415-master
Young Ninja #3Key: R20120118-175418-master

Do not taunt them unless you want to get poked by a sharp sword…

Rinds

Filed under: lenses, life, photography, photos — Eric Jeschke @ 10:01 pm

Rinds

Key: R20120116-153351

Konica Hexanon 50mm f1.4

Older Posts »

Theme: Shocking Blue Green. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.