Red Skies at Night

August 14, 2008

Selling prints on ebay

Filed under: books, business — ejeschke @ 10:36 pm

I noticed that Brian Auer is selling his prints on ebay.   I’ve seen some other photographers do that too, and I wonder about ebay as a vehicle for selling “fine-art” photography.  Yes, you are auctioning off your work, but ebay is no Sotheby’s.  It rather has a bit of a the feel of a flea market.  The pages are functional, but do not show off the work in a very classy way. And yet, it’s got a lot of eyeballs there, so it’s a more ready made market than hanging out your shingle on a personal web site.  I also know there are lots of people that will pay higher prices on an auction site than they would on a regular e-commerce site because they think they are getting a deal.  (This is how so many copies of the open-source GIMP image editing software are sold, even though it’s freely available elsewhere.)  It’s also all set up for e-commerce, so no hassle setting up your own system.

What are your thoughts about selling photography on ebay?

August 12, 2008

On Galleries vs. Artists

Filed under: business, noted — ejeschke @ 9:32 pm

Interesting notes about the symbiotic and yet adversarial relationship between galleries and artists, from the blogs of Edward Winkelman.  The whole process appears like a sort of chess game.  See

Whither the gallery?  I’d say the galleries are in a very strong position to continue to prop up the art market for photography.  In a period of flux (as we clearly are in the photography market, with an absolute deluge of “product” out there), art buyers are likely to retreat to what is safe and known to advise them on their purchases.  The fact is, millions of photographers have hung out a shingle trying to sell work online.  But the sites that are really taking off are the Getty microstocks, the 20×200s, etc.  Run by art buyers that know and understand the art market.

But the 50% commission? Winkleman makes a good argument for that in a bricks and mortar gallery, but online, there oughtn’t be much overhead after the initial investment of setting up a site.  Also, the touted “gallery-artist” relationship will be somewhat different if formed online, and may be even more shallow and cynical than described.

July 24, 2008

On print pricing

Filed under: business — ejeschke @ 1:09 am

Head’s up–if you are interested in the whole topic of print pricing, do yourself a favor and head on over to The Landscapist and read this blog entry (including comments).  Very interesting reading.  There’s a good case to be made there why you can’t cut out the middlemen (galleries), unless you are already very well established.

20×200 is an interesting enterprise, and I’d be more than surprised if a lot of gallery owners are watching that with an eye to doing their own version of it.

July 11, 2008

Whither Microstock

Filed under: business, noted — ejeschke @ 12:17 am

July 10, 2008

CafePress acquires Imagekind

Filed under: business, framing, noted, printing — ejeschke @ 11:31 pm

Today I received an email notification that Imagekind (the site where I host some of my work for sale) has been acquired by CafePress (whom I’ve also used on occasion).  It’s an interesting acquisition, and one that I hope does not change Imagekind too much.  They are really a pretty nice outfit for fine art printing.  Details here.

July 8, 2008

On the Flickr/Getty Deal

Filed under: business, noted — ejeschke @ 11:16 pm

Following up several links to this breaking story (notably this, and this) about Getty Images (the famous stock photo agency) inking a deal with Flickr to allow Getty photo buyers to tap into selected/vetted Flickr photographers.

Pretty interesting stuff.  Very interesting, in fact, following the prognostications here about Getty’s future in still photography being in microstock.  The situation just looks bleaker and bleaker for the professional photographer trying to follow the traditional trajectory.

The really interesting thing is that they are claiming there is no hidden microstock play here.  The thing is, I just can’t see Flickr not rolling out a microstock service that would compete with this.  I’m really surprised, actually, that this hasn’t happened yet.  The only rational explanation is that Flickr is positioning themselves as the conduit for all these third party players, so that selling/licensing, etc. is just another service like minicards, prints, books, dvds, etc.  If so, then expect to see a microstock service show up eventually, possibly also via Getty, and pushed out toward the “second tier” Flickr users.

Older Posts »

Blog at WordPress.com.