<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CafePress acquires Imagekind</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redskiesatnight.com/2008/07/10/cafepress-acquires-imagekind/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redskiesatnight.com/2008/07/10/cafepress-acquires-imagekind/</link>
	<description>Featuring photography by Eric Jeschke</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:22:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: theoart</title>
		<link>http://redskiesatnight.com/2008/07/10/cafepress-acquires-imagekind/#comment-1282</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[theoart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redskiesatnight.wordpress.com/?p=346#comment-1282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As long as ImageKind keeps doing what they do and not merge themselves or allow CafePress to take over production, all should be okay. ImageKind is focused more on printing for professionals therefore they should give the attention to detail needed. If not there are a few other companies, including FinerWorks.com which does virtually the same thing as ImageKind but is a smaller company.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as ImageKind keeps doing what they do and not merge themselves or allow CafePress to take over production, all should be okay. ImageKind is focused more on printing for professionals therefore they should give the attention to detail needed. If not there are a few other companies, including FinerWorks.com which does virtually the same thing as ImageKind but is a smaller company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

