<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mini-Review: Ricoh GX-100</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redskiesatnight.com/2008/03/30/mini-review-ricoh-gx-100/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redskiesatnight.com/2008/03/30/mini-review-ricoh-gx-100/</link>
	<description>Featuring photography by Eric Jeschke</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:22:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricoh Caplio GX-200 [digital!]</title>
		<link>http://redskiesatnight.com/2008/03/30/mini-review-ricoh-gx-100/#comment-1074</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ricoh Caplio GX-200 [digital!]]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 20:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redskiesatnight.wordpress.com/?p=199#comment-1074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] GX&#8211;200 is the updated version of the well&#8211;received GX&#8211;100, a camera that has received positive reviews from discerning [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GX&#8211;200 is the updated version of the well&#8211;received GX&#8211;100, a camera that has received positive reviews from discerning [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricoh GX100</title>
		<link>http://redskiesatnight.com/2008/03/30/mini-review-ricoh-gx-100/#comment-1016</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ricoh GX100]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 18:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redskiesatnight.wordpress.com/?p=199#comment-1016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Red Skies at Night review - Great review! Phototropic review - Great video included in this review. It really gives you a feel for how compact and small this camera is! Another review with sample pictures Northlight Images review [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Red Skies at Night review &#8211; Great review! Phototropic review &#8211; Great video included in this review. It really gives you a feel for how compact and small this camera is! Another review with sample pictures Northlight Images review [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Puplet</title>
		<link>http://redskiesatnight.com/2008/03/30/mini-review-ricoh-gx-100/#comment-671</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Puplet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redskiesatnight.wordpress.com/?p=199#comment-671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Read this. Bought one today. Cheers for the hole in my wallet! :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this. Bought one today. Cheers for the hole in my wallet! <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wouter Brandsma</title>
		<link>http://redskiesatnight.com/2008/03/30/mini-review-ricoh-gx-100/#comment-661</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wouter Brandsma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 04:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redskiesatnight.wordpress.com/?p=199#comment-661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eric,

I don&#039;t use the HA-2 adapter or anything similar. I was considering it and I also asked Ricoh if it would be sufficient, but they seriously did not know. They even remarked that the GX100 is actually an indoor camera! I just said them they shouldn&#039;t mislead me. Nothing about that is mentioned in their manual, not even on their site. They didn&#039;t tell me that when I bought the camera. 4 out of 5 example photos on their site are obviously taken in the outdoor. I replied that if the GX100 is indoor camera than at least supply the camera with proper flash compensation, because it is mostly too bright.
It is a great camera. The overal built is good en lens gives outstanding results. But the lens assembly has a problem. If the GRDII would haven been available in June last year I would have bought that camera.

With regards,
Wouter]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t use the HA-2 adapter or anything similar. I was considering it and I also asked Ricoh if it would be sufficient, but they seriously did not know. They even remarked that the GX100 is actually an indoor camera! I just said them they shouldn&#8217;t mislead me. Nothing about that is mentioned in their manual, not even on their site. They didn&#8217;t tell me that when I bought the camera. 4 out of 5 example photos on their site are obviously taken in the outdoor. I replied that if the GX100 is indoor camera than at least supply the camera with proper flash compensation, because it is mostly too bright.<br />
It is a great camera. The overal built is good en lens gives outstanding results. But the lens assembly has a problem. If the GRDII would haven been available in June last year I would have bought that camera.</p>
<p>With regards,<br />
Wouter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ejeschke</title>
		<link>http://redskiesatnight.com/2008/03/30/mini-review-ricoh-gx-100/#comment-660</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ejeschke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 07:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redskiesatnight.wordpress.com/?p=199#comment-660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wouter,

Do you use lens accessories with the GX-100 (e.g. wide angle adapter, filters, etc.)?

--Eric]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouter,</p>
<p>Do you use lens accessories with the GX-100 (e.g. wide angle adapter, filters, etc.)?</p>
<p>&#8211;Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: globalglamour</title>
		<link>http://redskiesatnight.com/2008/03/30/mini-review-ricoh-gx-100/#comment-658</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[globalglamour]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 22:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redskiesatnight.wordpress.com/?p=199#comment-658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oooh, thanks needed to know what peoplefelt bout these camera&#039;s now I know what one to buy!!!

G.G.
xoxo
www.globalglamour.wordpress.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oooh, thanks needed to know what peoplefelt bout these camera&#8217;s now I know what one to buy!!!</p>
<p>G.G.<br />
xoxo<br />
<a href="http://www.globalglamour.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.globalglamour.wordpress.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antara</title>
		<link>http://redskiesatnight.com/2008/03/30/mini-review-ricoh-gx-100/#comment-657</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[antara]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redskiesatnight.wordpress.com/?p=199#comment-657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eric,
I tried Settings with BW again this morning and I believe I was mistaken about being able to use both at the same time.
Your tests?  I&#039;m just getting acquainted with this camera.
Antara]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric,<br />
I tried Settings with BW again this morning and I believe I was mistaken about being able to use both at the same time.<br />
Your tests?  I&#8217;m just getting acquainted with this camera.<br />
Antara</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wouter Brandsma</title>
		<link>http://redskiesatnight.com/2008/03/30/mini-review-ricoh-gx-100/#comment-656</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wouter Brandsma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redskiesatnight.wordpress.com/?p=199#comment-656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Ricoh can do something about the dust problems of the GX100 I would be very pleased. I just noticed a new dust spot on my photos. That is the second time within a half year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Ricoh can do something about the dust problems of the GX100 I would be very pleased. I just noticed a new dust spot on my photos. That is the second time within a half year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wouter Brandsma</title>
		<link>http://redskiesatnight.com/2008/03/30/mini-review-ricoh-gx-100/#comment-655</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wouter Brandsma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redskiesatnight.wordpress.com/?p=199#comment-655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an excellent review and I also agree on some of the proposals you added for a follow-up of the GX100. Like the larger sensor, larger buffer for faster raw write times, extended EV compensation for bracketing, built in neutral density filter, flash compensation.
Some things I find personally less interesting. For instance shutter priority (it is not a speed deamon), extended date settings, and digital zoom (I hardly use the 72mm anyway).
I wrote an impression of the GX100 in my blog (http://wouter28mm.wordpress.com/2008/03/22/my-ricoh-gx100-impressions/) and for Seriouscompacts.com (http://www.seriouscompacts.com/2008/03/my-ricoh-gx100-impressions.html).
Thanks for sharing. Wouter Brandsma]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an excellent review and I also agree on some of the proposals you added for a follow-up of the GX100. Like the larger sensor, larger buffer for faster raw write times, extended EV compensation for bracketing, built in neutral density filter, flash compensation.<br />
Some things I find personally less interesting. For instance shutter priority (it is not a speed deamon), extended date settings, and digital zoom (I hardly use the 72mm anyway).<br />
I wrote an impression of the GX100 in my blog (<a href="http://wouter28mm.wordpress.com/2008/03/22/my-ricoh-gx100-impressions/" rel="nofollow">http://wouter28mm.wordpress.com/2008/03/22/my-ricoh-gx100-impressions/</a>) and for Seriouscompacts.com (<a href="http://www.seriouscompacts.com/2008/03/my-ricoh-gx100-impressions.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.seriouscompacts.com/2008/03/my-ricoh-gx100-impressions.html</a>).<br />
Thanks for sharing. Wouter Brandsma</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antara</title>
		<link>http://redskiesatnight.com/2008/03/30/mini-review-ricoh-gx-100/#comment-649</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[antara]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 07:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redskiesatnight.wordpress.com/?p=199#comment-649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eric
I believe you can use  Settings 1 and 2  in most modes. I took some tests(in dpreview Ricoh forum near the top) in P mode in color with different settings.
I just shot a B&amp;W with -2 and +2 for contrast and sharpness and , altho its low light here at my computer, it seems to confirm that 
it works. Try it yourself. You will notice BW staya &quot;marked&quot; even when you move down to Settings in the menu
Antara.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric<br />
I believe you can use  Settings 1 and 2  in most modes. I took some tests(in dpreview Ricoh forum near the top) in P mode in color with different settings.<br />
I just shot a B&amp;W with -2 and +2 for contrast and sharpness and , altho its low light here at my computer, it seems to confirm that<br />
it works. Try it yourself. You will notice BW staya &#8220;marked&#8221; even when you move down to Settings in the menu<br />
Antara.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

